Obama Signs Executive Order, National Guard to be sent to Africa to fight Ebola - Report by Mary Greeley
Executive Order: Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Individual Ready Reserve Members of the Armed Forces to Active Duty
Executive Order -- Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Sept 18, 2014
-On September 18, 2014, in conjunction with public statements regarding United States intervention in the West African Ebola Epidemic, the White House issued a new Executive Order entitled, "Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria."
Ebola is a hemorrhagic fever caused by a virus, not a bacterium. Nonetheless, the bureaucratic control structure established by the EO is broad enough, especially in conjunction with other Executive Orders and regulations, to cover preparations for what the CDC itself has called the "inevitable" Ebola outbreak in America.
read full Executive Order here
Executive Order -- Revised List of Quarantinable Communicable Diseases
REVISED LIST OF QUARANTINABLE COMMUNICABLE DISEASES - July 31, 2014
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 264(b) of title 42, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to Executive Order 13295. Based upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Acting Surgeon General, and for the purposes set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003, as amended by Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, section 1 of Executive Order 13295 shall be further amended by replacing subsection (b) with the following:
"(b) Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza."
Sec. 2. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Could Congress Legalize Raw Milk? The natural health community has been touting the benefits of raw milk for years. Now there are two bipartisan bills in Congress to help legalize it. Action Alerts! In a victory for supporters of the raw milk movement, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY), Chellie Pingree (DME), and a bipartisan coalition of eighteen other lawmakers, have introduced two congressional bills:
· * The Milk Freedom Act of 2014 would overturn the interstate ban on raw milk, as well as provide relief for small, local producers who have been harassed, fined, and prosecuted for distributing unpasteurized dairy.
· * The Interstate Milk Freedom Act of 2014 would allow the interstate shipment of raw milk between two states where the sale of raw milk is already legal.
Raw milk is natural and healthful. The government estimates that 1% to 3% of Americans are drinking it. As the Weston Price Foundation notes in their Real Milk campaign, people are 35,000 times more likely to get sick from other FDA-protected foods than from raw milk.
Executive Order #13575 - Establishment of the Rural Council: Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.
Lakota Indians Establish Their Own Country Within the United States
During the week of December 17 - 19, 2007, Lakota Indian leaders traveled to Washington DC and withdrew from the constitutionally mandated treaties to become a free and independent country. They do so in a fully honest, legal, and ethical manner.
U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY ADOPTS DECLARATION ON RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES;
'MAJOR STEP FORWARD' TOWARDS HUMAN RIGHTS FOR ALL, SAYS PRESIDENT
Vote: 143 4 ( Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States) - 11;
The General Assembly today overwhelmingly backed protections for the human rights of indigenous peoples, adopting a landmark declaration that brought to an end nearly 25 years of contentious negotiations over the rights of native people to protect their lands and resources, and to maintain their unique cultures and traditions.
By a vote of 143 in favour to 4 against (Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States), with 11 abstentions, the Assembly adopted the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which sets out the individual and collective rights of the world's 370 million native peoples, calls for the maintenance and strengthening of their cultural identities, and emphasizes their right to pursue development in keeping with their own needs and aspirations. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/ga10612.doc.htm
International Advocates for Health Freedom - http://www.iahf.com
IAHF List: See http://www.codexalimentarius.net/timetab.htm
The Pharma Cartel has sped up its timetable for shoving a highly
restrictive, genocidal, Codex vitamin standard down our throats by deciding
to hold annual (instead of biannual) meetings of the Codex Committee on
Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Use, from now on until they
finalize their entire agenda.
You can see the schedule on at the url above. Meetings of the CCNFSDU, (the
Codex Committee pushing the restrictive vitamin standard) are now scheduled
in Berlin, Germany for:
2001: November 26-30
2002: November 4-8
2003: November 3-7
Whereas I previously estimated it could take another 5-6 years for the
Cartel to push their agenda for vitamins through to completion at step 8
(its at step 3 now), it is painfully clear to me that the Cartel could now
do it by 2003, not only because they have advanced their timetable, but
also because they will be letting a large number of third world countries
join the committee, expanding it considerably.
The problem with this is that in the third world, you can easily buy a
Codex delegate with the proverbial blonde and a case of Scotch.
Multinational corporations have gross revenues that dwarf those of third
world nations which are very easily manipulated by promises of money and
jobs. At Codex, its one country, one vote, with zero consideration given to
the population of a country, or whether or not the country even
manufactures dietary supplements. The so called Codex "process" goes
diametrically against our entire system of representative government, as we
are "represented" by an unelected bureaucrat (Dr.Beth Yetley) from a
Federal Agency with a very long history of bias and outright hatred against
dietary supplements (the FDA).
On March 20, 2001, Congressman Dan Burton whitewashed the Codex vitamin
oversight hearing, where the only person allowed to present testimony on
the Codex vitamin issue (Karl Riedel, co chair of NNFA's International
Committee) made some highly questionable statements under oath when he
asserted that "Codex won't impact our domestic laws, it will only impact
our international sales." Cspan videotape of Riedel making these statements
will be put on the IAHF website, with a complete analysis of how what he
said was simply not true.
For one thing, the FDA has announced, through a speech in 1997 by former
acting Commissioner Friedman, their intention to harmonize their regs to
international standards. The transcript of this speech can be found at
http://www.fda.gov/ola/1997/319.html Scroll down to #6 International
In it Friedman stated: "FDA plans to amend its regulations and procedures
for consideration of standards adopted by CODEX. This action is
being taken to provide for the systematic review of CODEX STANDARDS in
order to enhance consumer protection, promote international
harmonization and fulfill the obligations of the United States under
(He's referring to the Sanitary Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, (SPS),
TBT and other numerous so called "Mutual Recognition Agreements"
signed under NAFTA and the WTO by a Congress that never read any of the
Text of the Sanitary Phytosanitary Measures Agreement
Despite his having been warned in writing by Congressmen Ron Paul and Peter
De Fazio that the Congressional Research Service had told Congressman Paul
that we in fact ARE required under the terms of our membership in the WTO
to harmonize our domestic laws to international standards, or face massive
trade sanctions, Congressman Burton did the bidding of the Pharma Cartel,
and would not allow any balancing testimony from other witnesses, who could
have brought forths the facts on this issue. http://www.iahf.com click on
the spinning green disk to see Congressman Paul and De Fazio's statement to
I am writing a book about the Codex Vitamin Issue. The purpose will be to
arm the people of the world with the suppressed truth in the hopes that the
American people, and consumers all over the world will come to see the
hidden truth, and will swarm their governments with a demand for health
freedom so strong that the Codex shell game might yet be stopped on a
political level. With each click of the mouse, we can send the truth about
the healing power of vitamins around the world so that more and more people
can be armed with the truth. Because our best defense is a good offense,
however, it also pays to be armed as a back up, in case our peaceful
entreaties continue to be ignored as they were on March 20 by Congressman
Burton due to the manipulations of Beth Clay. A government that does not
fear its citizens is the most dangerous government there is.
As things stand, there is nothing whatsoever standing in the way of the
complete destruction of our domestic dietary supplement laws, except the
fact that the American people are very heavily armed, and if pushed too far
on this and other issues of sovereignty, will undoubtedly rebel against
such traitorous actions as Burton's, and will refuse to allow the
imposition of this genocidal United Nations/Pharma Cartel agenda. Strongly
recommend joining Concerned Citizens Against Police States
http://www.ccops.org also http://www.goa.org Gun Owners of America
IAHF encourages more people to examine the truths of the Codex vitamin
issue on the IAHF website at http://www.iahf.com Please forward this email
to more people. If you appreciate this effort to expose the Codex shellgame
and the New World Order so that it can one day be stopped, please send a
donation to IAHF POB 625 Floyd VA 24091 USA Donations can also be made
electronically by paypal on the IAHF website. Thank you for your help.
Not enough vitamin consumers, health food store owners and vitamin
manufacturers truly understand the Codex vitamin issue due to spin control
from pharmaceutical interests controlling vitamin trade associations world
wide who've actively been misleading people as to what is really going on.
The primary way in which Americans are being misled on the Codex vitamin
issue is this:
We're being told by the FDA, Congress, and by the Vitamin Trade
Associations and Citizens for Health that a finalized Codex vitamin standard
"will NOT impact our laws, it will only impact our foreign sales of
vitamins." This has confused many vitamin consumers who've sent letters to
Congress requesting a Codex vitamin oversight hearing who've been told
things by their Congressman or Senator that were scripted by the FDA which
is deliberately misleading, and the same garbage is being echoed by the
pharmaceutically dominated vitamin trade associations (CRN and NNFA) and by
Citizens For Health (due to the money they get from pharmaceutical
interests which compromise their objectivity.)
Charles Raubicheck, attorney for NNFA
stated that our vitamin laws are safe from Codex in a spin piece on the
Codex vitamin issue that went out in NNFA Today in September of '99.
He is misleading his membership, and he most likely wrote the article to
defend the business interests of the largest members of NNFA, which are
multinational pharmaceutical companies.... such as Warner Lambert, which
owns Capsugel, an employee of which (Randy Dennin) is the Chair
of NNFA's International Committee which determined NNFA's pro FDA, pro
pharmaceutical, pro NAS, anti consumer position.......
The "REASONS" given for this erroneous statement are as follows:
1. They're claiming that an exemption clause in the Federal Statute that
GATT Trade Agreement (now the WTO) "protects" our laws from harmonization
to international standards.
On PAPER they are "correct".... however in REALITY this widely touted
"exemption clause" is nothing more than a paper tiger due to how the WTO's
Dispute Settlement Body operates, and due to the immense pressure they can
exert on Congress to change our laws. Thus it is TRUE that Codex can't
DIRECTLY force changes to our laws. In THEORY we could "allow ourselves" to
be hit with trade sanctions. In REALITY, no country can afford to be due to
all countries dependence on foreign trade. No country on earth today has
"AUTARKY" any more. "Autarky" means having self sufficiency within ones own
WHAT IS THIS ALLEGED EXEMPTION CLAUSE?
19 USC 3512(a)(1) Which says that
"No provision of any of the Uruguay Round Agreements, nor the application
of any such provision to any person or circumstance, that is inconsistent
with any law of the United States shall have any effect." The statute
further states that "nothing in the URAA (Uruguay Round Agreements Act)
"shall be construed to amend, or modify any law of the United States,
including any law relating to the protection of human, animal, or plant
life or health, the protection of the environment, or worker safety, or to
limit any authority conferred under any law of the United States.... unless
specifically provided for in this act."
So, are the FDA, Congress, CRN, NNFA, and CFH LYING when they claim this
exemption clause "protects" our laws from harmonization to Codex standards?
Strictly speaking, NO, they are NOT LYING, but they are being VERY
MISLEADING and although their assertion isn't a LIE, strictly speaking, due
to how things actually play out in WTO Dispute Settlments, they might as
WELL be lying, and here is why:
When a WTO Dispute Panel recommendation is based on the Agreement on the
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) , The
SPS Agreement provides that members may either base their sanitary and
phytosanitary measures on international standards, guidelines or
recommendations, where they exist, or may introduce measures that result in
a higher level of protection IF THERE IS A SCIENTIFIC JUSTIFICATION or
which a country determines to be appropriate in accord with the provisions
of the SPS agreement.
So, what happens if a country doesn't harmonize their laws to the emerging
highly restrictive Codex vitamin standard?
Nothing would happen unless the country were challenged by another country,
say a country wishing to sell high potency vitamins for far more money by
prescription in the USA which might say that DSHEA posed an unfair trade
barrier. The challenging country could go to the WTO's Dispute settlement
body and say "The only legal basis for the USA to have a standard higher
than the Codex vitamin standard is on a basis of SAFETY. They could then
say "The standard on safety has been jointly determined by the Food and
Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Science combined in deliberation
with the Scientific Committee on Food of the European Commission, and they
have made rulings on Safe Upper Limits of vitamins and minerals which are
much LOWER than what DSHEA allows. Therefor, the USA's vitamin laws EXCEED
that which these bodies consider SAFE, and since the FDA agreed to those
terms at the Codex meeting, the USA must either harmonize its laws, or face
trade sanctions." The UL's are in the process of being agreed upon by the
Trans Atlantic Business Dialogue, and the Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue,
wherein neither body conducts business out in the open, neither are subject
to the Freedom of Information Act, and the alleged TACD does not in FACT
represent American consumers at ALL! The TACD includes such rabid anti
vitamin opponents as Bruce Silverglade of Center for Science in the Public
Interest, and Sidney Wolfe of Public Citizen, both of whom have stated
publicly that DSHEA should be repealed! In an international forum both men
would be quite in favor of American dietary supplement laws being
harmonized to grossly restrictive international standards. When I
challenged Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch to take up the Codex vitamin
issue as a powerful way of calling the American public's attention to the
dangers of harmonization, due to Sid Wolfes anti vitamin stance, they have
steadfastly REFUSED to help IAHF get the word out on this! So, Nader's
groups are both massively hypocritical in their stance against the WTO.
They're against it, as long as it opposes their agenda, otherwise they're
Through this means Congress would have its arm severely twisted. Congress
would be told by the Dispute Settlement Body that we can't justify our
higher standards on a basis of safety, and because of how the DSB of the
WTO is structured, (they only allow testimony from government officials
such as Yetley of FDA and none from private citizens or NGO organizations)
there would be no appeal!
The WTO's DSB could impose massive trade sanctions against broad sectors of
our economy unless we harmonized, and these trade sanctions could effect
several large industries, all of which can send lobbyists crawling all over
capital hill like ANTS. The media would assist the assault on vitamins with
all kinds of propagandistic news stories to support the harmonization of
our laws, and Congress will kowtow to the multinationals out of fear of
losing PAC money that they need to run for reelection. Would the American
people be able to offset such a powerful lobby? I'm seeing mostly APATHY
when I try to call this issue to the Average American's attention right
now, because its just not REAL to them. Unless more people wake up in TIME,
it won't BE real to them until they start seeing Congress sell us out and
harmonize our dietary supplement laws. If it takes THAT long for the
American consumer and small vitamin companies to wake up, it will be too late.
HOW MUCH TIME DO WE HAVE TO DEFUSE THE CODEX BOMB?
We have until March of 2001 to stop the EU vitamin proposal by helping the
European health freedom fighters to WAKE UP vitamin consumers and small
vitamin companies all over the EU! We must get vitamin consumers world wide
to sign Josef Hasslbergers anti Codex, Anti EU Vitamin Directive Petition
at http://www.laleva.org/petizione/english/petitioneng.html and we must
request that Congressman Dan Burton hold a Codex vitamin hearing to examine
this issue fully.
WHY HASN'T BURTON HELD A HEARING ON CODEX VITAMIN ISSUE ALREADY?
The main reason he hasn't is that some very powerful forces are fearful
that if one were held, its impact would go far beyond just the issue of
vitamins, it would also raise SERIOUS questions as to the wisdom of our
being in the WTO, and it would provide a large impetus for Congressmen to
cosponsor Ron Paul's bill The American Sovereignty Restoration Act which
would get us OUT of the UN, and stop this destruction of our sovereign laws.
IS THERE REALLY ANY PROOF THAT OUR LAWS ARE BEING HARMONIZED TO
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS or IS THIS JUST "CONSPIRACY THEORY"
Evidence is found that our laws are being harmonized to those of the EU
right now on the website of the Council for Responsible Nutrition in a
press release from the recent Trans Atlantic Business Dialogue meeting
where they flat out TELL us that CEO's from multinational pharmaceutical
companies that are members of the "dietary supplement working group of the
TABD have decided on how to harmonize American and EU vitamin regulations"
All of this happened behind closed doors, with no chance for any consumer
anywhere in the world to have any say in the matter, and because TABD is
not a government body, they're not subject to the Freedom of Information
Act, so there is no way to examine the specifics of the meeting: Americans
and citizens of all 15 EU countries are being actively disenfranchised.
The CRN contacts listed at the end of the press release refuse to communicate.
Don't take my word for it, see it yourself at
You can download the CODEX REPORT FROM BONN: http://www.lef.org/fda/fda.htm
For more information on WTO and CODEX plus other alerts: check into the web site
International Advocates for Health Freedom http://www.iahf.com
Newsletter / Calendar of Events / Planet ONE Network / EarthNews / Astrology / Health Beat / Products / Links / About Us/ Business Opportunity